Posts Tagged ‘ Zombies ’

I think they use witchcraft

July 8, 2018
By

The following came in the email today: On Jul 7, 2018, at 12:58 PM, Submissions <submissions@**.co.in> wrote: Hello Dr. Andrew Gelman, I am Dr. ** [American-sounding name], Research Assistant for the ** Publishing Company contacting you with reference from our Editorial Board. Are you tired of publishing your Manuscript in useless journals and get no […] The post I think they use witchcraft appeared first on Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference,…

Read more »

Tutorial: The practical application of complicated statistical methods to fill up the scientific literature with confusing and irrelevant analyses

July 5, 2018
By
Tutorial:  The practical application of complicated statistical methods to fill up the scientific literature with confusing and irrelevant analyses

James Coyne pointed me with distress or annoyance to this new paper, “Tutorial: The Practical Application of Longitudinal Structural Equation Mediation Models in Clinical Trials,” by K. A. Goldsmith, D. P. MacKinnon, T. Chalder, P. D. White, M. Sharpe, and A. Pickles. This is the team behind the PACE trial for systemic exercise intolerance disease. […] The post Tutorial: The practical application of complicated statistical methods to fill up the…

Read more »

On this 4th of July, let’s declare independence from “95%”

July 5, 2018
By

Plan your experiment, gather your data, do your inference for all effects and interactions of interest. When all is said and done, accept some level of uncertainty in your conclusions: you might not be 97.5% sure that the treatment effect is positive, but that’s fine. For one thing, decisions need to be made. You were […] The post On this 4th of July, let’s declare independence from “95%” appeared first…

Read more »

The “Psychological Science Accelerator”: it’s probably a good idea but I’m still skeptical

June 26, 2018
By

Asher Meir points us to this post by Christie Aschwanden entitled, “Can Teamwork Solve One Of Psychology’s Biggest Problems?”, which begins: Psychologist Christopher Chartier admits to a case of “physics envy.” That field boasts numerous projects on which international research teams come together to tackle big questions. Just think of CERN’s Large Hadron Collider or […] The post The “Psychological Science Accelerator”: it’s probably a good idea but I’m still…

Read more »

Josh “hot hand” Miller speaks at Yale tomorrow (Wed) noon

June 13, 2018
By

Should be fun. The post Josh “hot hand” Miller speaks at Yale tomorrow (Wed) noon appeared first on Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science.

Read more »

Nooooooooooooooooo! (dentists named Dennis, still appearing in 2018)

June 3, 2018
By
Nooooooooooooooooo! (dentists named Dennis, still appearing in 2018)

From today’s NYT: Another finding of note, published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology in 2002, is that people gravitate toward places of residence and occupations that resemble their own names. So, the researchers assert, a higher proportion of men named Louis live in St. Louis than would occur at random, and a […] The post Nooooooooooooooooo! (dentists named Dennis, still appearing in 2018) appeared first on Statistical…

Read more »

All Fools in a Circle

May 31, 2018
By

A graduate student in psychology writes: Grants do not fund you unless you have pilot data – and moreover – show some statistically significant finding in your N of 20 or 40 – in essence trying to convince the grant reviewers that there is “something there” worth them providing your lab lots of money to […] The post All Fools in a Circle appeared first on Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference,…

Read more »

“Not statistically significant” != 0, stents edition

May 30, 2018
By

Doug Helmreich writes: OK, I work at a company that is involved in stents, so I’m not unbiased, but… http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/newsandeventspggrp/imperialcollege/newssummary/news_2-11-2017-15-52-46 and especially https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/02/health/heart-disease-stents.html The research design is pretty cool—placebo participants got a sham surgery with no stent implanted. The results show that people with the stent did have better metrics than those with just the […] The post “Not statistically significant” != 0, stents edition appeared first on Statistical Modeling,…

Read more »

Some experiments are just too noisy to tell us much of anything at all: Political science edition

May 29, 2018
By
Some experiments are just too noisy to tell us much of anything at all:  Political science edition

Sointu Leikas pointed us to this published research article, “Exposure to inequality affects support for redistribution.” Leikas writes that “it seems to be a really apt example of “researcher degrees of freedom.'” Here’s the abstract of the paper: As the world’s population grows more urban, encounters between members of different socioeconomic groups occur with greater […] The post Some experiments are just too noisy to tell us much of anything…

Read more »

Write your congressmember to require researchers to publicly post their code?

May 25, 2018
By

Stephen Cranney writes: For the past couple of years I have had an ongoing question/concern . . . In my fields (sociology and demography) much if not most of the published research is based on publicly available datasets; consequently, replicability is literally a simple matter of sending or uploading a few kilobytes of code text. […] The post Write your congressmember to require researchers to publicly post their code? appeared…

Read more »


Subscribe

Email:

  Subscribe